Di Bella's method vs Chemotherapy (a short summary)

Published on Sunday, 07 July 2013

Di Bella experimentation: Why did it fail?Di Bella's method vs Chemotherapy (a short summary)


[Di Bella's Method vs Chemotherapy (a short summary) - Parma 4/Apr/1998 #1 - Prof. Luigi Di Bella ]{jumi [jumi/Player.html]}



The relationship, in fact, between the Di Bella Multitherapy and the traditional techniques. What can we say, what certainty can we give to those who are, perhaps, torn by this dilemma.

Prof. Luigi Di Bella:

So, I'm not torn, because I am convinced.

The gap between one and the other we all know what it is. With chemotherapy the aim is, administering particular substances, poisons, to kill the bad cells, cancer cells. The trouble is this, that a substance that kills only those cells, leaving intact the others does not exist! The result is that these substances are injected and the person is reduced to a larva. I see some who truly are in terrible conditions. They did chemotherapy, so much that indeed for me, sometimes those are real murders!

The conclusion may seem absurd to you: I have told you about growth factors, among other things I told you about retinoic acid, vitamin A, and so on. When I start my protocol on patients...


I apologize professor, you will agree with me, if we can curb this phenomenon of mobile phones, so we can listen to the professor in peace. Please professor.

Prof. Luigi Di Bella:

When I say, I inject these substances, into individuals who find themselves in these conditions, I get a result that sometimes amazes myself.

For example, the white blood cells you know they are at least 4000 in a mm^3 of blood. I see bloods dropping to 2000, 1000 and something. Even in some cases hundreds. It must be said, danger indeed, to die for the so impressive reduction of the white blood cells. Well, I start with my protocol: whites, reds and platelets begin to rise and within 10-15 days they get back to almost normal values. So it means that the substances that I give with my protocol actually increases cells growth. Produce a growth of cells. All right.

This is one of the first principles of my protocol. The destruction of neoplastic cells with my protocol occurs for the competition between the normal cell which grows and the inability of the neoplastic cell to use all the resources that are available in the same point at which the normal cell grows. In other words, with my protocol, it is again restored the balance between the compartment of the normal cell and the compartments of the neoplastic cell. With the stimulation of growth, I block the growth of neoplastic cells. Not with the destruction of tumor cells. So it is an apparent absurd.


So, then, Professor, this is another question, from those who might have already had cycles of chemo or radio and would like now to follow the Di Bella multitherapy. They ask us, if possible, after how long you can, since the end of the cycle of chemo.

Prof. Luigi Di Bella:

Well, the answer is simple: publishing on oncology has no limits. Works that have begun to explicitly declare the damage of chemotherapy already date back to a decade ago. Now if you want to set up a different treatment from the chemical one, many times you can do it when the individual has reached certain levels. Sometimes we are forced, because when the patient arrives in extremely emaciated conditions: he can hardly eat any more, cannot digest, cannot move, the heart goes by God’s mercy, the pressure has dropped to the lowest levels, etc.

In those conditions, recover the patient's condition is a tough problem. There you must first be internists and then oncologists. But first internist physicians. When you are in this condition, the person, a bit at a time, a bit at a time can recover. But many times chemotherapy has destroyed organs that are essential for life!

For example, an individual who has had chemotherapy, comes and asks for my protocol. But who are the ones that will have a normal heart rate? I see frequencies of 115, 120, if we are lucky. Saying to have a frequency of 120, 115 means that the heart beats to push blood and after half a second must beat once again. Every half second it must do all this. But a heart that must continue throughout life in these conditions, how can it hold? In other words chemotherapy has reduced it under poor conditions.

So the conditions of circulation, not only that, but everything that we eat, from the intestine passes through the liver, it undergoes a radical change in the liver. But the liver, there are livers that are in tatters, after chemotherapy. So in this case too, at times, the recovery is difficult. So the conditions are critical at the expense especially of the heart and the circulation, brain, liver and kidney!

When all of these organs are more or less battered it is a problem to regain an individual who has undergone those tremendous alterations by chemotherapy. When you succeed, sometimes you can, however how many people there are that I treat with my multitherapy and I can no longer restore the number of white blood cells to normal values!

They stand on values of 2800, 3000, 3200. I can never get them up to 4000. That is to say, the matrix of some cells has been permanently destroyed!

Not only does this, but also for the reds, but also all the rest: how many people there are, just walk four steps and begin to pant. The lung has lost its elasticity: the ability to exchange gases through the pulmonary alveolis is gone. Chemotherapy can lead to a massive destruction! Something sacred happens, which is entrusted to our care, our only ambition should be to bring it back to its former conditions.

He who undergoes chemotherapy tells me, after a certain cycle: “The tumor has shrunk. It has reduced by these many millimeters. All right, and when it is reduced by these many millimeters what have we reached with that?

There, now I would like to ask these people the significance of the reduction of tumor volume.

The reduction in volume of a tumor may be due to many factors: may depend on the death of neoplastic cells, can also be caused by a dehydration of the tumor. May also depend on a decrease in the blood supply that reaches the tumor. So before you declare victory it is necessary to find out the reason for the reduction in tumor volume.

Not always the volume reduction is an expression of activity of the substance that is injected. Which is to say, we get… with the protocols that are being implemented we get to these points here: the reduction of the volume is not a true index, or at least is not always a reliable indicator that could allow us to say: this substance, this treatment is effective. These are the criteria.


Transcripted by: Mirko Viviani;

Translated by: Davide Iafrate.